[DISCUSSION] Pokemon Theory? - Printable Version +- Pokemon Forever (http://pokemonforever.com) +-- Forum: POKéMON (http://pokemonforever.com/Forum-POK%C3%A9MON) +--- Forum: General Pokemon Discussion (http://pokemonforever.com/Forum-General-Pokemon-Discussion) +--- Thread: [DISCUSSION] Pokemon Theory? (/Thread-DISCUSSION-Pokemon-Theory) |
Pokemon Theory? - Swimmingpenguin791 - Jan 27, 2016 One pokemon Theory i think is this It makes sense? Right? tell me your theory down below! And do you think this theory is really accurate and do you agree with me if you do Mention that too! RE: Pokemon Theory? - Swimmingpenguin791 - Jan 29, 2016 right?? RE: Pokemon Theory? - Frost - Jan 29, 2016 Err I just got confused........ RE: Pokemon Theory? - Swimmingpenguin791 - Jan 29, 2016 @MistressGlaceon lol RE: Pokemon Theory? - Jdawg - Feb 1, 2016 (Jan 29, 2016, 01:17 PM)MistressGlaceon Wrote: Err I just got confused........ Technicly glaceon could be kyurem RE: Pokemon Theory? - pritchman227 - Feb 1, 2016 (Feb 1, 2016, 08:53 AM)Jdawg Wrote:(Jan 29, 2016, 01:17 PM)MistressGlaceon Wrote: Err I just got confused........ I seriously wonder how a Glaceon would turn into Kyurem. RE: Pokemon Theory? - rcaldwell585 - Feb 1, 2016 that theory is kind of like the one that jynx magmar and electabuzz were supppsed to be the origional kanto bird trio because fire punch ice punch and thunderpunch were there moves other than hitmontop who could learn all three onlythey could learn them what do you think |