Jan 12, 2015, 03:31 PM
(Jan 12, 2015, 02:44 PM)Rogue Wrote: Through that logic me making a bad prediction against someone with a Gogoat is the same as me making a bad prediction against someone with a Arceus.
It's not that Greninja "changes" Pokemon. It's the fact that it limits team building.
Simply telling me that I'm wrong and if you just "out skill" your opponent isn't enough. I need a better reason to why I'm wrong. You said my examples were poor yet you haven't actually given me a reason why Greninja shouldn't have been banned.
I don't want to endlessly argue with anyone. Give me a team that works well against Greninja and works perfectly in an OU environment. Then once you do give me a reason why I HAVE to run that exact team if I want to play OU, and why that's okay, and finally tell me how using that team promotes individuality. /:
1. I'm not arguing. This thread was created to discuss the banning of Greninja. We are discussing just that.
2. Asking me to give you a team just to take down ONE Pokémon is ridiculous and I'm not going to waste my time. Who builds an entire team just to counter one Pokémon? By that logic, if you can't list a team of six Pokémon that all can handle a Venusaur for example, then he should be banned.
3. You said I didn't give you an example as to why I thought you were wrong, but I did. Besides that, I don't have much to add that hasn't already been said anyways.
