Jan 12, 2015, 01:49 PM
In all honesty, I think you're wrong there. Yes, you're correct in the way that predictions work both ways. But whats different is the RISK that it holds. Go ahead and make your prediction, but what if you're wrong? What if I don't switch? Your swampert just lost half health. Or even if I predicted that, and use grass knot. Your swampert is gone just from a bad prediction, and that was the the only thing on your team that can stop my heatran.
It's much more than what you're thinking, the predictions cost too much. You can't risk making lengthy predictions because if you're wrong you outright lose the entire match, and you can't tell me I'm wrong there.
Once again: Give me a team of 6 Pokemon that don't care about Greninja whatsoever and can still survive in an OU environment. If someone can do that for me, I'll praise you immensely. But even if you DID find something out like that, why should I HAVE to run that team of 6 Pokemon forever?
It's much more than what you're thinking, the predictions cost too much. You can't risk making lengthy predictions because if you're wrong you outright lose the entire match, and you can't tell me I'm wrong there.
Once again: Give me a team of 6 Pokemon that don't care about Greninja whatsoever and can still survive in an OU environment. If someone can do that for me, I'll praise you immensely. But even if you DID find something out like that, why should I HAVE to run that team of 6 Pokemon forever?
50 thousand people used to live here...Now it's a ghost town.
